Police: Device Near Women's Health Clinic Was a Bomb

Posted 4/27/07


Sources say it contained nails; federal agencies join investigation.

By Tony Plohetski, Claire Osborn and Elizabeth Campbell

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF


Friday, April 27, 2007

A package found Wednesday in the parking lot of a South Austin women's clinic that performs abortions contained a bomb that could have seriously injured or killed people had it not been spotted by a clinic employee, officials said Thursday.

A terrorism task force made up of local and federal investigators is still trying to determine who left the package near the Austin Women's Health Center at 1902 S. Interstate 35, north of Oltorf Street, and are reviewing footage from the clinic's security cameras.

The southbound access road of Interstate 35 north of Oltorf Street in South Austin was closed much of the evening Wednesday as officials investigated a package found in the parking lot of the Austin Women's Health Center.

During a news conference Thursday, investigators declined to be more specific about the contents of the package — which was in what Austin Assistant Police Chief David Carter called a "carry-all bag" — other than to say that it contained explosive powder.

Two sources familiar with the contents, who didn't want to be identified because of the ongoing investigation, said the device also contained nails. Jimmie Oxley, a nationally known explosives expert and chemistry professor at the University of Rhode Island, said bomb makers often add nails to devices to make them deadlier.

Investigators also would not say how the device was put together or how the bomb would have detonated. Officials have not commented on possible suspects or motives or why the clinic was targeted.

"The device was a dangerous device," Carter said. "We believe it was capable of detonation."

Officials with the Austin Women's Health Center declined to comment on the incident other than to say in a statement: "We are committed to the health and well-being of our patients. Our office will continue to provide the same outstanding health care we have been providing for the last 30 years."

The clinic, founded in 1976, was open Thursday; a sign in front warned against trespassing.

The incident renewed fears among some of another wave of violence against abortion clinics. During a rash of attacks against clinics in the 1990s, a number of doctors and employees were murdered.

It also comes at a time when the abortion rights debate has made national headlines: Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.

The discovery of the bomb prompted increased vigilance among other Austin clinics where abortions are performed and was condemned by people who support and people who oppose abortion rights.

Joe Pojman, the executive director of Texas Alliance for Life, which opposes abortion, said he was dismayed to hear about the device at the clinic.

"It's just plain wrong," Pojman said. "This is very counterproductive to the abortion debate, and it hurts our cause."

People who want to reduce abortions in Texas should concentrate on getting measures passed to prevent unintended pregnancies, said Laurie Felker Jones, the deputy political director at NARAL Pro-Choice Texas. Jones called Wednesday's incident "unacceptable."

On Tuesday, as the Supreme Court prepared to rule on the act banning late-term abortions, the professional association of abortion providers in the United States and Canada sent an update to its members, advising them to tighten their clinics' security measures.

"We know from past experience that any time abortion is featured prominently in the news, there is often an increased chance of violence and disruption at clinics," said Vicki Saporta, president of the National Abortion Federation. In Austin, several abortion providers declined to discuss their security measures in detail, saying that it could thwart efforts to keep patients and staff members safe. "Most clinics might have cameras, security videotaping and alarm type of situations," said Amy Hagstrom Miller, president of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers.

Miller, who is also the executive director of Whole Woman's Health in Austin — one of four abortion providers in Austin — declined to comment on what security measures her business was taking.

"Security is a reality for us every day," she said. There are no abortion clinics in Hays County; there is one in Williamson County, Miller said. Sarah Wheat, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood, said Austin has always been supportive of women's health care, including abortions, at her facility.

"I think when something like this happens, it doesn't fit with the support we have now," she said.

The last major incident involving a Texas abortion provider was an arson at the Fairmount Center in Dallas in 2002. The case has not been solved, according to the group.

In 2003, the construction of a Planned Parenthood facility in Austin was delayed when abortion-rights opponents launched a telephone and e-mail campaign against contractors who supplied goods or services for the construction of the 20,000-square-foot facility on East Ben White Boulevard.

As a result, the building's original general contractor, San Antonio-based Browning Construction Co., withdrew from the project in November 2003. Planned Parenthood opted to serve as its own general contractor and didn't release the names of its subcontractors, aiming to protect them from protesters.

More than 200 arsons and bombings have occurred at reproductive health care clinics across the United States and Canada since the mid-1970s, according to the National Abortion Federation's Web site.

According to the federation, 32 incidents of violence or disruption against abortion providers in the United States and Canada were reported in the first three months of 2007, along with five hoax devices or suspicious packages. In 2006, abortion clinics reported seven bomb threats and four attempted bombings or arsons.

tplohetski@statesman.com; 445-3605

This is insane. This could happen anywhere, even at a clinic that just does women's health (pap smears, breast exams, sti testing). Another example of fundamentalists that pursue a selfish agenda to squelch health care of women.

Hippocatic Oath or Another Fundamentalist Load of Crap?

Posted 4/12/07


I find it interesting that most all of the crap that spews from the conservative fundamentalist base is mendacious and factitious. That they lie when the truth would have sounded better. My experience with anti-choice individuals and organizations has taught me to always look under the rock they are standing on. I thought I would do a little research on the validity of their latest claims. One of which is "The Hippocratic Oath that physicians swear to, forbids all abortions and euthanasia." Well, all I can say to that is HOGWASH! I hope I can dispel any confusion to their claims.

The most literal translation of the Greek Hippocratic Oath reads:

I swear by Apollo Physician, by Asclepius, by Health, by Heal-all, and by all the gods and goddesses, making them witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture: To regard my teacher in this art as equal to my parents; to make him partner in my livelihood, and when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his offspring equal to my brothers; to teach them this art, if they require to learn it, without fee or indenture; and to impart precept, oral instruction, and all the other learning, to my sons, to the sons of my teacher, and to pupils who have signed the indenture and sworn obedience to the physicians¹ Law, but to none other.
I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgment, but I will never use it to injure or wrong them. I will not give poison to anyone though asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a plan. Similarly I will not give a pessary to a woman to cause abortion. But in purity and in holiness I will guard my life and my art.
I will not use the knife either on sufferers from stone, but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein. Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will do so to help the sick, keeping myself free from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from fornication with woman or man, bond or free. Whatsoever in the course of practice I see or hear (or even outside my practice in social intercourse) that ought never be published abroad, I will not divulge, but consider such things to be holy secrets.
Now if I keep this oath and break it not, may I enjoy honour, in my life and art, among all men for all time; but if I transgress and forswear myself, may the opposite befall me.

(It does not read ALL TYPES of Abortion) It only refers to pessary. Plus, most medical schools do not even pledge to this oath.

HISTORY OF MEDICINE: ON THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

The following points are made by Howard Markel (New Engl. J. Med. 2004 350:2026):

1) Although many scholars dispute the exact authorship of the writings ascribed to the ancient physician Hippocrates, who probably lived sometime between 460 and 380 B.C., the oath named for him is simultaneously one of the most revered, protean, and misunderstood documents in the history of medicine.(1) To begin with, it is often misquoted. For example, the mantra of "First, do no harm" (a phrase translated into Latin as "Primum non nocere") is often mistakenly ascribed to the oath, although it appears nowhere in that venerable pledge. Hippocrates came closest to issuing this directive in his treatise Epidemics, in an axiom that reads, "As to diseases, make a habit of two things -- to help, or at least, to do no harm." Secondly, there are many scholars who dispute that Hippocrates even wrote the Oath.

2) Many physicians practicing today are surprised to learn that the first recorded administration of the Hippocratic Oath in a medical school setting was at the University of Wittenberg in Germany in 1508 and that it did not become a standard part of a formal medical school graduation ceremony until 1804, when it was incorporated into the commencement exercises at Montpellier, France.(2) The custom spread in fits and starts on both sides of the Atlantic during the 19th century, but even well into the 20th century relatively few American physicians formally took the oath. According to a survey conducted for the Association of American Medical Colleges in 1928, for example, only 19 percent of the medical schools in North America included the oath in their commencement exercises.(3) With the discovery of the atrocities that were committed in the name of medicine during World War II and the growing interest in bioethics in the succeeding decades, oath taking began playing an increasing part in graduation ceremonies.(4)

3) Today, nearly every US medical school administers some type of professional oath to its share of about 16,000 men and women who are eager to take possession of their medical degrees. Yet it is doubtful that Hippocrates would recognize most of the pledges that are anachronistically ascribed to him. Such revisionism is hardly unique to our era. Indeed, the tinkering with Hippocrates' oath began soon after its first utterance and generally reflected the changing values, customs, and beliefs associated with the ethical practice of medicine.

4) Consequently, there are stark differences between the promises made in the original version and the oaths sworn today. To take the most obvious example, few if any of us now believe in the ancient Greek gods Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panaceia, and we therefore no longer pledge allegiance to them. Indeed, the evidence indicates that spirituality in general -- regardless of its form -- now has a distant relationship with medical science: a "content analysis" of the oaths administered at 147 US and Canadian medical schools in 1993 showed that only 11 percent of the versions invoked a deity.(5)

5) There are two highly controversial vows in the original Hippocratic Oath that physicians continue to ponder and struggle with as a profession: the pledges never to participate in euthanasia and abortion.(1) These prohibitions applied primarily to those identified as Hippocratic physicians, a medical sect that represented only a small minority of all self-proclaimed healers. The Hippocratics' reasons for refusing to participate in euthanasia may have been based on a philosophical or moral belief in preserving the sanctity of life or simply on their wish to avoid involvement in any act of assisted suicide, murder, or manslaughter. We have fairly reliable historical documentation, however, that many ancient Greeks and Romans who were confronted with terminal illness preferred a quick, painless death by means of poison to letting nature take its course. Moreover, there were no laws in the ancient world against suicide, and it was not uncommon for physicians to recommend this option to a patient with an incurable disease. Similarly, abortion, typically effected by means of a pessary that induced premature labor, was practiced in both ancient Greece and the Roman Empire. Many Christian revisions of the Hippocratic Oath, especially those written during the Middle Ages, prohibited all abortive procedures. Not surprisingly, the contentious debate over both of these issues continues today, although the relevant sections are simply omitted in most oaths administered by US medical schools. As of 1993, only 14 percent of such oaths prohibited euthanasia, and only 8 percent prohibited abortion.(5)

References (abridged):

1. Edelstein L. The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation and interpretation. In: Temkin O, Temkin CL, eds. Ancient medicine: selected papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967:3-64

2. Nutton V. What's in an oath? J R Coll Physicians Lond 1995;29:518-524

3. Carey EJ. The formal use of the Hippocratic Oath for medical students at commencement exercises. Bull Assoc Am Med Coll 1928;3:159-66

4. Smith DC. The Hippocratic Oath and modern medicine. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996;51:484-500

5. Orr RD, Pang N, Pellegrino ED, Siegler M. Use of the Hippocratic Oath: a review of twentieth century practice and a content analysis of oaths administered in medical schools in the U.S. and Canada in 1993. J Clin Ethics 1997;8:377-388

So, onward through the fog. Keep up the good fight, to save and maintain every woman's right to choice. As President William Clinton once stated "Abortion should be safe, legal and rare."